Friday, April 8, 2011
Does Free Education Equal Quality Education?
Here is a tsunami boiling beneath political propaganda and like everything else we know, it will one day explode in our faces and we will all pretend we did not know about it. Imagine a society of people who cannot express themselves in proper English, teaching your children or great grand children in school, or representing you as your local government chairman or councillor, or governor or senate representative or maybe as your president. It is not that he speaks a native tongue… no, not at all, it is that he speaks English with so much gusto and confidence while his verbs and tenses are scattered abroad like Jews. Forgive my noting the obvious.
The debate is not so much free education as it is quality education. When we do things in our half-hearted manner, we tend to praise our shallow efforts as being the final and only solution to the problem. So here we are praising free education as the solution to illiteracy, when we do not have to look farther than our backyard or the national news to see that illiteracy is a chronic disease that may demands a life changing operation.
Well, here I am on a sunny afternoon trying to cool off in a fancy boutique and the store owner is in a fix. She finally has a sales girl but she might as well be without one. The sales girl is a product of free yet poor quality of education. She claimed to have taken WAEC but cannot read or spell correctly. And this is not one exception among a thousand; this is between 35 and 40 out of a class of 50 in any public school on any given day. It is not enough to send our kids to the best school there is and think it is the only thing to be done, history has shown over time, and we fail to learn, that if the man who takes the lead is somewhat educated, his wife may just be the disease carrier.
Does free education equal quality education? Here’s our debate!
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
The Politics of the Present Nigerian Voter
Nigerians are at once fortunate and unfortunate to be going to the polls at a time such as this when the world and especially Africa is experiencing change on a major scale. In an age where people are enlightened and unafraid of change we have been called out to “a one man, one vote” election that is praised as being the one time when Nigeria will have elections that are not predetermined.
We
are thus fortunate to have this election going on in a time where revolutions
are fashionable in the world and in Africa and unfortunate in the sense that we
have an electorate whose sense of duty and responsibility has been dulled as
far as participating in this process is concerned.
Change
cannot be expected to take effect immediately; it is always resisted at the
initial stage and praised when it produces positive results. But here is an
opportunity to build from the foundation a stable political system, howbeit
challenging, by taking hold of this Johnathanistic invention of “One man, One
vote.” This process is not an invention of chance for as Voltaire, my
favourite French Writer said, "Chance is a word void of sense; nothing can
exist without a cause."
The
cause for this laudable process is the corruption that has long coloured this
course, one that we have decried for so long. To be then given a taste of
something of positive difference and yet to be afraid to embrace the change we
have long sought is foolishness to me. And yet again as Voltaire said, "It
is hard to free fools from the chains they revere."
It
is therefore pertinent that we do not act as fools but that we put aside our
impertinence and desist from looking for everything wrong with our political
system. We should act! We cannot hope for any meaningful development if we do
not insist on change. We have been given the process, our only politics, is
action! We must embrace this opportunity to speak and to be heard.
Democracy
indeed is the politics of the voter and America has proven this theory true in
the way that her politics is conducted, issues are resolved at the polls and it
is not the electing of a man, although his character is investigated and
judged, it is the electing of an idea, an ideal whether it is presented by a
party or by a man representing the party. It is not, as Obama proved to America
and the world, a politics of “I can do that” but that of “Yes we can”.
Having
been given this opportunity, what should our response be, should we hold on to
our prejudice and be “Nigerian” about it by insisting on that
nothing-works-in-Nigeria-except-through-corruption attitude? Should we sit back
and watch how this turns out and not be directly involved in how it turns out?
I
run the risk of sounding political but I like to think that my views are more
nationalistic than political, I am not advocating a party or a person, I am
advocating a process that could eventually lay the power of this democracy in
the hands of its true owners- the people.
The
present electoral process needs to be embraced and used effectively to its
maximum if we are truly going to experience the change that we all seek.
It
is easier, as I always say, to be complacent and watch from the sidelines, and
instead of encouraging, to criticize the process and discourage everyone
involved in making it work. In doing so, we not only take from ourselves the
right to exercise our authority as voters, but also the right to protest when
things do not work.
We
cannot afford to base our excuse on what is past. In light of where we are as a
nation that excuse fails to hold true and has no value whatsoever.
We
need to get off our cowardly stance of lookers – on and get involved in this
growth process and not wait to criticize a truly honest effort when and if
it fails. And should it fail, we will not lay the blame anywhere
else but at our doors because this is not about a party, a person or a clown,
this is about us, this is about Nigeria. Let us not be cowardly and act with
ostentatious swagger by insisting on judging our future by our past.
Our
only politics is action - Vote Wisely!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)